Let’s do an experiment.
In any experiment, one starts with a question or problem, forms a hypothesis as to what they think will answer the question or solve the problem, then sets about testing the soundness of that hypothesis. At least that’s what I seem to recall from my high school science classes.
So, here are my questions. Will journalistic publishers ever provide unbiased information or at the very least, present ALL the sides of an argument with descriptions of where bias my bleed into them from the participating parties? Are journalists and editors and publishers capable of delivering data and opinions in a manner that stimulates conversation, understanding, and informed decisions? Or are they just about ego and money-generating clickbait?